Subject: Re: A2 Trade/Swap ... site ... Path: lobby!newstf02.news.aol.com!portc01.blue.aol.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!ord-feed.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.uiowa.edu!news1.icaen!garp3.icaen.uiowa.edu!apple2pd From: apple2pd@garp3.icaen.uiowa.edu (ground.ecn AppleII Librarian) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Date: 12 Jul 2000 18:25:21 GMT Organization: Iowa Computer Aided Engineering Network, University of Iowa Lines: 27 Message-ID: <8kid6h$3t8$1@server05.icaen.uiowa.edu> References: <3962000D.5B28CDF@inetnebr.com> <3963fbf7.121835474@news> <8k17qa$dqc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3964c31d.172825006@news> NNTP-Posting-Host: ground.ecn.uiowa.edu In article <3964c31d.172825006@news>, Jeff Blakeney wrote: > >None of the emulators I have seen come with the ROM image (with the >exception of a really old one called SIMIIE but it apparently didn't >use Apple's ROM). The user of the emulator must make an image from a >machine that they own. As we have been discussing, it looks like this >is a legal use of the ROM code. I know that KEGS includes instructions on how to make ROM image files from an actual IIGS. I understand the others include instructions on how to download ROM image files from the internet. KEGS is a great emulator, but usually an emulator like Bernie is recommended by many of the more vocal copyright defenders. Is there a dual-standard for legal use of ROM code? Personally, I have no problems with either approach. Especially because Apple Computer knows about it and does NOT object, which is one of the requirements for copyright protection/violation. We can discuss the merits of either approach to use of ROM images, but it is all wasted use of internet resources, IMHO. -- --Steve (apple2pd@ground.ecn.uiowa.edu)